8 minutes read

Whether renting a new house or their first apartment, new and experienced renters alike can benefit from taking out renters’ insurance. However, choosing the right policy can be tricky.

There are many details to consider before purchasing, and a good understanding of how renters’ insurance works is essential. One of the most important things to know is the difference between actual cash value (ACV) and replacement cost value (RCV) policies.

There’s a big difference between the two, and choosing one over the other can have a huge impact on the cost of the insurance as well as the amount that can be claimed back in case of damage, theft, or vandalism. In this guide, we’ll take a look at the differences between ACV and RCV policies and other factors that can help renters make the best choice when choosing insurance.

Renters’ Insurance: The Basics

renters insurance basics

Before delving into the differences between ACV and RCV policies, it’s worth going over the basics of renters’ insurance and how it works. Essentially, renters’ insurance is designed to protect renters and their belongings from numerous potential issues, depending on the level of insurance that the renter takes out. While similar to homeowners’ insurance, it differs in that renters’ insurance doesn’t cover issues with the actual building.

Meanwhile, renters’ insurance covers the cost of repairing or replacing the renters’ personal belongings in case of damage, theft, or vandalism. More comprehensive policies also offer liability cover, protecting the renter from legal action, and additional living expenses. These protections will often appear as the following on renters’ insurance policies: Personal possessions, personal liability, and additional living expenses.

In this guide, we’ll be focusing on personal possessions protection. Renters will typically have a choice as to the level of protection they can take out on their belongings: actual cash value (ACV) and replacement cost value (RCV). The two options differ in the way the insurer calculates the cost of replacing or repairing any damaged, destroyed, or stolen items when the renter makes a claim.

Actual Cash Value (ACV) Policies

Actual cash value policies tend to be more affordable, with lower monthly payments compared to replacement cost value policies. That’s because they tend to pay out less on claims.

Insurers who cover the actual cash value of the renters’ belongings will reimburse the renter for the cost of the damaged or lost items at the item’s current value. This figure takes into account depreciation, i.e., the loss of value an item suffers over time. From TVs to coats, all items lose value over time, which means the cost that the insurer will reimburse will typically be lower than the purchase value of an item.

For example, a renter who bought a TV for $2,000 five years ago won’t be reimbursed the full amount if it’s damaged in a fire or stolen. Instead, the insurer will calculate how much the TV was worth at the time of the claim, taking depreciation into account. The renter will then be reimbursed this amount, which in this case could be around $1,000—far lower than the purchase price.

In most cases, the amount the renter will claim back won’t be enough to cover the cost of buying a brand new replacement.

Replacement Cost Value (RCV) Policies

Replacement cost value policies are different. While they’re generally more expensive in terms of monthly payments, renters can expect them to pay out much more in case of claims.

Insurers offering an RCV policy will reimburse the renter for the full retail price of a replacement item of similar specification and quality if the original is damaged, destroyed, or stolen. This reduces financial strain in case of a claim, as renters will usually be able to replace or repair their items without paying any extra.

For example, with an RCV policy, that same $2,000 TV will be reimbursed at the full retail price of $2,000, making it much easier to cover the cost of purchasing a replacement. The same applies to any other items that are covered by the policy. This can soon result in the renter enjoying a claim of many thousands of dollars.

acv or rcv

Deductible Amounts

The majority of renters’ insurance policies, both ACV and RCV, require the renter to pay what’s known as a deductible amount. This is the amount that the renter is required to pay towards replacing or repairing their belongings before the insurer will cover a claim.

Renters will usually be able to choose the deductible amount they wish to pay, typically around $500 to $1,500. In most cases, the higher the deductible payment, the lower the monthly premium. It can make sense to choose a higher deductible amount if finances allow, but if a claim is made, that amount will need to be paid upfront, so it’s important to have the funds readily available.

Choosing the Best Renters’ Insurance Policy

Choosing between ACV and RCV renters’ insurance often boils down to financial availability. Actual cash value policies are often more tempting as they’re usually around 10% cheaper than RCV policies each month. However, in the case of a claim, it can cost the renter much more to fully replace all their belongings.

Meanwhile, while an RCV policy may be more expensive each month, if a claim is made, the renter can rest assured that, besides paying the deductible, the full cost of replacing their items will be covered by the insurer. Not only does this provide peace of mind, but it also makes it far easier to budget for the worst-case scenario. Plus, by increasing the deductible, the monthly cost can be reduced.

In some cases, the insurer may offer the renter the opportunity to lower their replacement cost coverage. In this way, the renter can choose to be covered up to a certain percentage of the replacement cost in order to bring the cost of the monthly payments down.

For example, if the renter chooses to cover their possessions for 75% of the replacement cost, they’ll be required to foot the bill for the remaining 25% of the replacement cost. However, this can drop the monthly cost of the premium considerably and will still pay out more than a typical ACV policy.

Is Renters’ Insurance Necessary?

Renters are not legally required to take out a renters’ insurance policy, so it can be tempting to avoid it altogether in order to save money on the monthly payments. However, not having renters’ insurance can end up costing far more in the long run. It covers renters and their belongings for a myriad of scenarios, such as theft, fire, and much more, and will offer enormous aid if items need to be repaired or replaced.

Without renters’ insurance, renters will have to cover the full cost of replacing any damaged or lost items. When considering items such as TVs, laptops, wardrobes full of clothes, musical instruments, and much more, the cost of replacing everything can soon rocket. It’s worth noting that renters’ insurance only covers items that belong to the renter. So, if the TV and furniture were provided by the landlord, their insurance will cover the cost.

Some landlords do require their tenants to take out renters’ insurance as part of the lease contract. In this case, the renter is obliged to take out a policy, otherwise, they’d void their lease agreement. Fortunately, renters’ insurance is normally fairly affordable, with the national average in the US of around $150 a year in 2025.

With renters’ insurance, choosing between ACV and RCV policies often comes down to how much the renter can afford to pay each month. However, while the cheaper ACV option might be the most tempting, a comprehensive RCV policy will be far more beneficial should the renter need to make a claim, especially if they own a lot of expensive items.

This article is intended for informational purposes only and should not be considered legal advice. Renters’ insurance options vary, and your situation may require personalized guidance. Before taking any action, it’s important to consult with a professional.

Image credit: Inna Kot / Shutterstock.com

Andra Hopulele is a Senior Marketing Writer at Yardi. With over seven years of experience covering real estate, she now focuses on AI's growing impact on multifamily operations - from intelligent leasing and resident engagement to portfolio management. Her work has appeared in The New York Times, Business Insider, Yahoo Finance and more.